Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature
Skip Navigation Links >

Last reviewed September 2024

Minnesota Issue Guide
Overview of Reapportionment and Redistricting in Minnesota

This guide is compiled by staff at the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library on a topic of interest to state legislators. It introduces the topic and points to sources for further research. It is not intended to be exhaustive.

Books and Reports  Articles  Internet Resources  Additional Library Resources

Drawing congressional and legislative district boundaries is a difficult political process. According to the Minnesota Constitution, article IV, sec. 3, "the legislature shall have the power to prescribe the bounds of congressional and legislative districts." It is "primarily a legislative responsibility; however, if the legislature fails to act after having adequate opportunity to do so the court should not allow elections under a constitutionally invalid scheme" (from Congressional and Legislative Reapportionment: A Legal History by House Research Department, 1970).

This guide provides a brief history and overview of the reapportionment and redistricting process in Minnesota. Each decennial redistricting process has a unique history. More specific and detailed redistricting guides are available by decade: 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020.

Reapportionment

Reapportionment is the reassignment of representatives proportionally among the states in accordance with changes in population distribution. According to the U.S. Constitution, article 2, section 2, the Census has one fundamental purpose: to ensure that the representation of each state is apportioned fairly in the 435 member U.S. House of Representatives according to population. Every ten years the U.S. Census Bureau conducts a census to determine the population of each state, and then calculates the number of representatives based on a method of equal proportions. The representation of each state must reflect the relative size of its population as compared to other states. Minnesota has had eight congressional seats since the 1960 census.

Title 13, U.S. Code (section 141) requires that the apportionment population counts for each state be delivered to the President within nine months of the census date. In most 20th century censuses, the official census date has been April 1, meaning that the Office of the President received the counts by December 31 of each census year. The apportionment process does not affect U.S. Senate seats since each state has two senators, regardless of population.

After congressional reapportionment, the census population counts are used for redistricting congressional districts, legislative districts, and local government districts. Constitutional and statutory requirements include standards for using census data to make districts evenly proportioned.

Redistricting

After reapportionment, redistricting begins. Redistricting is the process by which new congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn. States determine their own methods for redistricting and they vary from state to state. In Minnesota, the state legislature plays the dominant role in legislative redistricting. Other states use commissions or a hybrid system to draw state legislative district lines. Each of Minnesota's 67 Senate districts includes within its boundaries two House districts for a total of 134 House districts and a combined total of 201 state legislative districts. Minnesota has eight congressional districts. 

The process begins when redistricting plans are drafted and proposed, with the goal of coming to consensus on plans that meet the technical requirements of law. These plan proposals lay out specific legal boundaries for each district. Minnesota's nonpartisan Legislative Coordinating Commission is responsible for assisting the legislature in carrying out its redistricting responsibilities under Minnesota Statutes, section 2.91

Plans are introduced as bills, often as two distinct bills - a congressional redistricting bill and a legislative redistricting bill. These bills must move through the legislative process like any other bill and must then be approved and signed by the Governor. The finalized plan must also stand up to any court challenges. The statutory deadline for new congressional and legislative districts is twenty-five weeks before the primary election (Minnesota Statutes, section 204B.14). Plans must be decided early enough to give sufficient time to prepare for the state elections in November of the year ending in two. If the Legislature is not able to adopt a plan by the statutory deadline, the matter is referred to the courts. 

"Once the Legislature has passed a redistricting bill, the Governor will have the option of signing it or vetoing it. If he signs the bill, redistricting has been accomplished. If he vetoes the bill, the Legislature might vote to override the veto. If the veto withstands an override attempt, a new bill must be written, passed and sent to the Governor" (see Fact Sheet on Reapportionment and Redistricting by Tom Gillaspy, Minnesota's State Demographer, 2000).

Role of the Courts

If the legislature is unable to pass the redistricting bills, the courts may impose a plan until the legislature can pass one. Furthermore, any resident who believes their district to be mal-apportioned can bring a suit to court to require a plan. Minnesota's congressional and legislative plans have often been challenged in the courts.

According to History of Minnesota Legislative Redistricting and History of Minnesota Congressional Redistricting by Alexis C. Stangl and Matt Gehring, courts have played a more significant role in the legislative redistricting process since 1950 and have drawn congressional plans since 1980. For more background on the roles of state courts and federal courts in redistricting litigation, see Chapter V, Prepare to Defend Your Plan in Both State and Federal Courts, from the treatise How to Draw Redistricting Plans That Will Stand Up in Court.

Local Redistricting

Once legislative districts are established, local units of government with districts apportioned by population must also redistrict. When all the districts have been determined, boundaries for election precincts are set. Election Guides for counties, cities, towns and school districts, as well as the 2021 Redistricting Guide by the Secretary of State's Office, explain the process and outlines legal responsibilities of both local officials and the Office of the Secretary of State.

Significant Books and Reports

(See the specific redistricting guides by decade for more reports about this process: 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020.)

Congressional and Legislative Reapportionment: A Legal History. St. Paul: Research Department, Minnesota House of Representatives, 1970.

Gehring, Matt. Minnesota Redistricting Process: A Historical Overview. St. Paul: Research Department, Minnesota House of Representatives, 2011. (JK6168 G44 2011)

Gehring, Matt. Voting Rights Act Overview. St. Paul: Research Department, Minnesota House of Representatives, 2011.

2021 Redistricting Guide. St. Paul: Minnesota Secretary of State. (JK6168 .R43 2021)

Redistricting Law 2020 [Member login required to download]. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures, 2019. (KF4905 .R42 2019)

Stangl, Alexis and Erickson, Andrew. Redistricting Principles for Congressional Districts in Minnesota: 1980-2010. St. Paul: Minnesota Legislature, Senate Counsel, Research, and Fiscal Analysis, 2021.

Stangl, Alexis and Erickson, Andrew. Redistricting Principles for Legislative Districts in Minnesota: 1980-2010. St. Paul: Minnesota Legislature, Senate Counsel, Research, and Fiscal Analysis, 2021.

Lowenthal, Alan S., PhD. "The Ills of Gerrymandering and Independent Redistricing Commissions as the Solution: Policy Essay." Harvard Journal on Legislation, Winter 2019. 

"Political Gerrymandering: Judicial Review of Partisan Redistricting." Supreme Court Debates, September 2019. 

Stangl, Alexis C., and Gehring, Matt. History of Minnesota Congressional Redistricting. St. Paul: Minnesota Legislature, Senate Counsel and Research and House Research Department, 2018. (JK1343.M6 S73 2018)

Stangl, Alexis C., and Gehring, Matt. History of Minnesota Legislative Redistricting. St. Paul: Minnesota Legislature, Senate Counsel and Research and House Research Department, 2018. (JK6168 .S73 2018)

Wattson, Peter. Districting Principles in Minnesota Courts. St. Paul: Peter S. Wattson, 2018. (JK6168 .W388 2018)

"Redistricting Showdown: Should Partisan Gerrymandering be Eliminated?" CQ Researcher, August 25, 2017.

Wattson, Peter. Enacting a Redistricting Plan. St. Paul: Minnesota Senate, Office of Senate Counsel and Research, 1997. (KF4905.W38 1997)

Wattson, Peter. History of Minnesota Redistricting. St. Paul: Peter S. Wattson, 2021. (JK6168 .W39 2021)

Wattson, Peter. How to Draw Redistricting Plans That Will Stand Up in Court. St. Paul: Peter S. Wattson, 2021. (JK1341.W382 2021)

Significant Articles

(articles in reverse chronological order)

Tanick, Marshall H. "Perspectives: Redistricting Calmer Here 30 Years After Ruling." Minnesota Lawyer, March 2, 2023.

Greenblatt, Alan. "Redistricting Battles." CQ Researcher, March, 2022.

Schultz, David. "Redrawing the Political Map in the 21st Century." Minnesota Lawyer, February 23, 2021. 

Schultz, David. "163 Years of Power, People and Partisanship." Minnesota Lawyer, February 16, 2021. 

Henderson, Tim. "State Lawmakers Begin Once-a-Decade Redistricting Fight." Stateline, January 29, 2021.

Kaul, Greta. "Why Does Minnesota Have 201 Legislators?" MinnPost, February 12, 2020. 

"Redistricting Showdown: Should Partisan Gerrymandering be Eliminated?" CQ Researcher, August 25, 2017.

Boese, Brandon L. "The Controversy of Redistricting in Minnesota." William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 39: Issue 4, Article 10, 2013.

Schultz, David. "A Short History of Redistricting in Minnesota." Minnesota Lawyer, December 7, 2011. 

Shaw, Charlie. "Redistricting Has Been a Mess in Each of the Past Four Decades." Minnesota Lawyer, October 6, 2010.

Lahammer, Gene. "Congressional Redistricting Anguish has Long History in Minnesota." Minnesota Lawyer, January 29, 2010. 

Significant Internet Resources

Congressional Apportionment and History: Title 13, U.S. Code - U.S. Census Bureau.

Elections & Redistricting - From the Minnesota House Research Department.

Laws that Relate to Minnesota Legislative and Congressional Redistricting - From the Minnesota House Research Office.

Redistricting and Census - Recommended Resources from the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)

Redistricting - From the Minnesota Legislature's Geographic Information Systems office. They also provide Historical Legislative and Congressional Maps.

Redistricting - Resources from the Elections Administration division of the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State.

Redistricting and the Supreme Court: The Most Significant Cases - NCSL's overview of the most significant Supreme Court decisions on redistricting from the last five decades.

Additional Library Resources

For historical information, check the following codes in the Newspaper Clipping File and the Vertical File:

  • A34 - Apportionment

For additional reports at the Legislative Reference Library, use these Library catalog searches:
Apportionment (Minnesota); Redistricting (Minnesota)Redistricting "Congressional Research Service"

For further information on redistricting see:

Issue Guides

Agriculture and Natural Resources

Children, Youth, and Families

Crime

Demographics

Education

Health

Legislature

Mining

Miscellaneous

Redistricting

Sports

State Government Budget and Programs

Transportation