Text: May 22, 2024The Honorable Tim WalzGovernor, State of Minnesota75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155Dear Governor Walz,We write to urge you to veto HF5247, the 1432-page conference committee report that was jammedthrough the legislature in mere minutes on Sunday evening in violation of House rules, Senate rules, JointRules of the Legislature, and the Constitution of the State of Minnesota.Article 4 Section 17 of the Minnesota Constitution states that "No law shall embrace more than onesubject, which shall be expressed in its title." The title for HF5247 alone is six full pages, includingdozens of individual subjects expressed in the title. It is inconsistent with the oath you swore to upholdthe Minnesota Constitution to sign this bill into law.Furthermore, signing this bill would signal to Minnesotans that you explicitly endorse the outrageous andunprecedented breach of process that put the bill on your desk.On Sunday evening, the bill was assembled in the HF5247 Conference Committee with fewer than threehours remaining in the session. In her motion, the Chair of the Committee reported incorrect bill numberswhen listing the bills that were set to be adopted, causing further confusion for anyone attempting to trackthe contents of the bill. While the Revisor of Statutes website indicates that the conference committeereport was posted at 10:49PM, legislators and the public were unable to access the report itself onlineuntil hours later, and legislators were unable to obtain a copy of the bill itself prior to the vote.Despite this stunning lack of transparency, the bill was brought immediately to the House floor, andpushed to a vote despite dozens of objections and privileged motions ignored by the Speaker of theHouse. The Senate followed suit soon after.Joint Rules are quite clear that conference committee reports "must be limited to provisions that aregermane to the bill and amendments that were referred to the Conference Committee. A provision is notgermane if it relates to a substantially different subject or is intended to accomplish a substantiallydifferent purpose from that of the bill." This bill plainly violated Joint Rules, as well as the rules in eachrespective chamber.Governor, your party has had two years of single-party control, and utilized every one of the 120legislative days permitted in our Constitution. The claim that the minority parties in the House and Senatesomehow obstructed the work of the majority, to the point that such drastic action was required, is simplyuntrue.Over the course of the final weeks of session, numerous bills were passed with minimal debate - some inas few as three or four minutes. The amount of time spent debating more controversial bills over the pasttwo weeks was neither unprecedented nor unwarranted. Both chambers spent appropriate timescrutinizing bills that contained hundreds of millions of dollars in tax increases, brand new languageadded in conference committees, and provisions that had never been debated in one or both chambers.Additionally, both the House and Senate Majorities contributed to the time crunch thanks to theirmismanagement of the floor schedule. On Saturday, May 18 the Senate spent more than 13 hours inrecess while the House continued to debate and pass bills. The House opted to spend substantial time ondebates for the ERA Constitutional Amendment and Ranked Choice Voting - bills that ultimately werenot even brought up in the Senate.Sadly, it seems that Democrat leadership has decided that this flagrant abuse of the legislative process andutter contempt for Republican legislators who collectively represent millions of Minnesotans is acceptablein the pursuit of partisan priorities. We hope that is not the case for you. You still have a chance todemonstrate that in Minnesota we are better than this, and that you still believe in the "One Minnesota"spirit upon which you campaigned.Signing this bill will be an endorsement of a process that will have serious consequences for bothchambers for years to come. Creating a legislative environment where rules, transparency, and process aresecond to the whims of partisanship is unhealthy for our state and for the legislature as an institution.We urge you to do what is right - not just what is politically expedient for you and your party - and vetoHF5247.Sincerely,Mark T. Johnson, Minority Leader, Minnesota SenateLisa M. Demuth, Minority Leader, Minnesota House of Representatives