The official site of Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura
Big Plan Results left arrow Return to big plan initiatives.

Improving the Competitive Position of Rural Minnesota

Agriculture is a critical segment of Minnesota's economy, just as farm and rural families are an important part of our identity and culture. Today, farmers face many economic, social and environmental challenges. State agencies need to work with farmers and rural communities to help them share in the economic growth experienced in the rest of the state.

State agencies should also help farmers by reducing unnecessary obstacles that limit their ability to be competitive in the world marketplace, while at the same time helping to safeguard the environment and our food supply. Likewise, we need to help make our rural communities centers of economic activity by producing employment opportunities to keep young people in their communities as well as off-farm employment to supplement farm income.

Lead Departments: 

Department of Trade and Economic Development

Support: 

Department of Agriculture

Farm Cabinet

The Big Accounting Initiative Score
Graph depicting non-Twin City share of Minnesota employment.
Click here to see The Big Accounting scores for all initiatives


Goal: Improve economic diversity of Greater Minnesota

Economic diversity in the six regions of Greater Minnesota.

Change in Minnesota off-farm wages.

Goal: Expand employment opportunities for Greater Minnesota.

Job growth (rate/number) in each Greater Minnesota region.

Share on new jobs in under-represented sectors in Greater Minnesota.

DTED facilitated expansions by businesses in under-represented sectors.

Greater Minnesota's share of statewide employment

Greater Minnesota's share of state business establishments and expansions

 

 

Economic diversity in the six regions of Greater Minnesota.

Economic diversity by region
Region 1991: 1994: 1995: 1996: 1997: 1998: 1999: 2000: 2001 Target: 2002 Target:
Northwest .06 .05 .04 .04 .03 .04 .04 .04 .04 .04
West Central .08 .05 .04 .04 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04 .04
Northeast .37 .30 .37 .36 .30 .28 .28 .26 .25 .25
Southwest .09 .07 .08 .10 .11 .11 .11 .10 .10 .10
Central .07 .05 .05 .05 .06 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05
Southeast .07 .07 .08 .08 .10 .10 .10 .10 .09 .09

Source: Covered Employment and Wages Program (ES-202), U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Calculations by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development.

Note: The diversity statistic measures similarity to the national economy (the diversity benchmark). The closer the statistic is to zero, the closer the distribution of regional employment mirrors the distribution of national employment.

Economic diversity is often cited as a means of surviving a downturn in a particular industry. Areas that are dependent on a few industries are seen as more vulnerable during a downturn in those industries than areas with a broader range of economic activity. For example, the Northeast region of Minnesota is the least diverse because of its dependence on mining and relatively low reliance on manufacturing and finance. An increase in Minnesota's economic diversity is generally seen as desirable.

Learn more at: http://www.dted.state.mn.us/big-pl-prog-rpt-f.asp or http://www.dted.state.mn.us

top arrow pointing up

 

Change in Minnesota off-farm wages.

Real off-farm wages per worker by region (in 1994 dollars)
Region 1994: 1999: 2002 Target:
Northwest $19,250 $20,405 $20,674
West Central $18,640 $19,699 $19,912
Northeast $22,674 $24,288 $24,495
Southwest $19,135 $20,843 $20,775
Central $20,461 $22,141 $22,405
Southeast $22,522 $24,477 $24,469

Source: Covered Employment and Wages Program (ES-202), U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index (CPI) data used to adjust for inflation also comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Note: Real per worker off-farm wages increased in every region between 1994 and 1999. The Southwest region experienced the greatest real off-farm wage growth per worker with an 12.4 percent increase between 1994 and 1999, dramatically less than the 29 percent increase in real per worker off-farm wages in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The Northwest, Central and Southeast regions had real per worker wage growth of between 10 and 11 percent between 1994 and 1999, while the Northeast and West Central regions had real per worker wage growth of less than 10 percent between 1994 and 1999.

The table shows real (adjusted for inflation) wages per worker for six Minnesota regions.

Learn more at http://www.dted.state.mn.us/big-pl-prog-rpt-f.asp or http://www.dted.state.mn.us

top arrow pointing up

 

Job growth (rate/number) in each Greater Minnesota region.

Graph depicting non-Twin City share of Minnesota employment.

Click for growth rates and number of jobs by economic development region.

Note: Job growth in all regions of the state is important to maintain balance between Minnesota’s urban and rural areas.  Strong growth throughout the state is benefits all regions.  Greater Minnesota’s regions did well in employment growth during the 1990s.  Although there were declines in some years, most regions generally grew each year. 

 

top arrow pointing up

 

Share on new jobs in under-represented sectors in Greater Minnesota.

Graph depicting non-Twin City share of Minnesota employment.

Click for growth rates and number of jobs by economic development region.

Note: The ideal regional economy is generally thought to have a balanced industrial mix. However, some regions have sectors that are under-represented, meaning that they have an employment share that is less than 80 percent of the national employment share for that sector. The data on the share of new jobs in under-represented sectors is very volatile between 1995 and 2000. This indicator may become less volatile as it becomes an important consideration in DTED’s activities.

 

top arrow pointing up

 

DTED facilitated expansions by businesses in under-represented sectors.

Number of business expansions facilitated by DTED
  2000 2001 2003
Statewide 28 17 Targets under
Greater MN 4 4 development

Source: Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development

Note: The Department of Trade and Economic Development is committed to expanding the state’s current industrial base while improving the diversity of the state’s economy.  Facilitating high-quality job expansions in industries where the state is under-represented helps ensure that that the state can profit from growth throughout the economy while minimizing future economic indicators.

 

top arrow pointing up

Greater Minnesota's share of statewide employment

Graph depicting non-Twin City share of Minnesota employment.

Non-metro share of MN employment 1994: 37.5% 1995: 37.5% 1996: 37.5% 1997: 36.8% 1998: 36.8% 1999: 36.7% 2000: 36.6% 2001 Target: 2002 Target: 37.5%

Source: Covered Employment and Wages Program (ES-202), U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Note: Increasing employment opportunities throughout Minnesota helps the entire state. When businesses and workers choose to be located outside the Twin Cities area, it helps the metro deal with potential congestion and urban sprawl issues.

This indicator divides total employment in areas outside of the Twin Cities by total state employment.

Learn more at http://www.dted.state.mn.us/big-pl-prog-rpt-f.asp or http://www.dted.state.mn.us

top arrow pointing up

 

Greater Minnesota's share of state business establishments and expansions

Graph depicting Greater Minnesota's share of state business establishments.

Greater Minnesota's Share of Business Establishments
1992: 42.5%
1993: 42.4%
1994: 42.1%
1995: 41.8%
1996: 41.3%
1997: 41.1%
1998: 41.0%
1999: 41.0%
2000: 40.6%
2002 Target: 41.0%
2003 Target: 42.0%

Graph depicting Greater Minnesota and Metro business expansions.

Business Expansions
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Greater Minnesota 18,780 18,775 21,223 19,769 18,834 19,641 18,878 15,538 14,194
Metropolitan Areas 20,068 21,094 23,199 22,183 20,777 21,627 20,901 17,389 14,682
Greater Minnesota's Share 48.3% 47.1% 47.8% 47.1% 47.5% 47.6% 47.5% 47.2% 49.2%

Sources: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development, Analysis and Evaluation Office.

Note: In order to have employment growth in Greater Minnesota, there must also be growth of businesses in these areas. Because most jobs are created by expanding businesses, this indicator examines Greater Minnesota's share of business expansions.

Learn more at http://www.dted.state.mn.us/big-pl-prog-rpt-f.asp or http://www.dted.state.mn.us

top arrow pointing up

 

Tell us what you think of these goals, their indicators of results, and our targets: